<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Infinite &#8220;Meta Book&#8221; and Random Textual Fingerprint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.methemedia.com/archives/410/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.methemedia.com/archives/410</link>
	<description>Rise of the Conversation Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:44:32 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: found-your-story</title>
		<link>http://www.methemedia.com/archives/410/comment-page-1#comment-8991</link>
		<dc:creator>found-your-story</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 08:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.methemedia.com/?p=410#comment-8991</guid>
		<description>Something kept puzzlingme, so I asked Sebastian the following:

Q: could this perhaps be called a fractal relationship -- i am not an expert, which probably explains my stupid question &gt;&gt;
&quot;According to this concept the word-frequency distribution of a text, with a certain length written by a single author, has the same characteristics as a text of the same length extracted from an imaginary complete infinite corpus written by the same author.&quot;

Thanks in advance for answering me. Regards, Jaap Bloem

Sebastian to me:
It is not a stupid question, however my answer would be no. I don&#039;t think it could be called a fractal relation because the term fractal indicates a scale invariant property. It means roughly that something should look the same at any scale, for example size. The sentence you quote could, in itself, apply to a fractal system but our results for real texts suggests that there is a size (length) dependence on properties like the average frequency or the exponents &#039;alpha&#039; and &#039;gamma&#039;. So, even though the word-frequency distribution looks the same for a short text and a section of a long text (of the same length), both of them are different from the long text.

I hope my reply makes any sense. Please ask me if you have more questions.

Best regards,
Sebastian Bernhardsson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something kept puzzlingme, so I asked Sebastian the following:</p>
<p>Q: could this perhaps be called a fractal relationship &#8212; i am not an expert, which probably explains my stupid question &gt;&gt;<br />
&#8220;According to this concept the word-frequency distribution of a text, with a certain length written by a single author, has the same characteristics as a text of the same length extracted from an imaginary complete infinite corpus written by the same author.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks in advance for answering me. Regards, Jaap Bloem</p>
<p>Sebastian to me:<br />
It is not a stupid question, however my answer would be no. I don&#8217;t think it could be called a fractal relation because the term fractal indicates a scale invariant property. It means roughly that something should look the same at any scale, for example size. The sentence you quote could, in itself, apply to a fractal system but our results for real texts suggests that there is a size (length) dependence on properties like the average frequency or the exponents &#8216;alpha&#8217; and &#8216;gamma&#8217;. So, even though the word-frequency distribution looks the same for a short text and a section of a long text (of the same length), both of them are different from the long text.</p>
<p>I hope my reply makes any sense. Please ask me if you have more questions.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Sebastian Bernhardsson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
